Bigeorge's Blog

guynflint

9 years ago

i've always liked young guys. even when i was the same..lols
but, the separation of age makes me a little uncomfortable. where as i may enjoy the site here i would never personally engage in a physical relationship with anyone under 25. it's just a personal issue for me. i won't judge anyone who differs from me. i also feel a bit un-eased on here when i see guys who are obviously too young.

superslammer

9 years ago

For once, I agree with tolead.

9 years ago

I can't believe this blog is still going, lol. That's the way love goes I guess ;)

darkknightreturns

9 years ago

some teens 16-25 seek out father figures on sites designed for it. I'm on a site www.silverdaddies.com I enjoy chatting and the company of guys 18-25.(I will not meet anyone under 18) My "prowess/performance ability " has long gone due to diabetes. I have been contacted by numerous young guys on the site, chatted with them and found a real connection with some. By the definition of some here I am one who preys. I beg to differ and I resent that claim. MY needs are not sexual, you can't stereotype all as predators, kids under the age of consent, and those who actively seek them out, yes. My most recent encounter, I was a approached and sought out by a guy 19, he's a teen! is there not a difference between 13 and 19? I see no unfair advantage here or exploitation. We must concede there is a difference between those that have the maturity and those that don't. We know ho the individuals here are that are the predators, It shows in their comments, their avatars, and private messages to some youth. Monitor and weed them out I say, before the cops eyeball the site. If WE don't clean up the problem by advising Nick when things are just not right. we run the risk of a shut down or worse charges being laid.

9 years ago

What's the point? I've noticed it's always the same individuals who come to the rescue to a blog like this. Like I said, more justification usually in the form of quoting some isolated civilization that will allow sex with kids. Underage is underage. Quoting this state or that state that allows it doesn't make it right. What's disgusting is everybody here knows it. Making your conscious feel better by attempting to justify it says it all. I shake my head every time. There is no justifying it to satisfy selfish desires. Ask those here who were taken advantage of for some adult's selfish thrill.

9 years ago

We aren't talking about "selfies" we are talking about people who prey on teens. The conversation to know that it is illegal and undoubtedly wrong and trying to "justify" it is the conversation. There is an undercurrent to the suggestion that looking at young teens should be OK. It is not. I happen to understand that point of view from personal experience. And those that want to look, also want to touch. And they are predators. I am done with this blog. And the entire the stench it leaves this site with. @bilpering you are just adept at trying to thread the needle as the others.

9 years ago

Tolead. How looking at photos (often selfies) can make one into a predator (in any sensible use of the word) I am at a loss to understand....another example of using emotive inaccurate language to try to bolster an argument. I could quote the "turn offs" in your profile and suggest you abide by what you say.

9 years ago

Right on point, Thomas (tolead).

9 years ago

As usual the conversation devolves into a semantics/terminology game. The issue is a legality...b. Any adult attempting to prey upon a teen of any age is a predator. And frankly these attempts to justify the idea is beyond contempt for me. As usainindia states so clearly it is about being a predator without any other additional labels. The power dynamic between and adult and a teen is an unfair advantage. And is wrong. Plain and simple.

9 years ago

Sadly Lunarwill gives good advice but at the same time the suggestion that liking anyone younger than 18 is pedophilia is nonsense. It is worth remembering that the totally outdated age of consent still applying in some US states at 18 is completely out of line with that most european countries which average about 15. The term pedophilia applies only to pre-pubescent children and therefore generally not to teenagers as objects of affection. If we are to have serious discussion on these issues use of emotive pejorative terms and inaccurate terminology needs to be avoided.

9 years ago

I stand by what I said earlier: Many of those pretty young boys are barely 18 years old. I'd think only a sexual predator would want them if they were 5 years younger.

9 years ago

Wtf? Sticks and stones mother fucker

9 years ago

Bigeorge, you're new here, so you don't know this, but I wouldn't expect any empathy or possibility for discourse when inferring that you might find someone under 18 attractive. Despite cognitive dissonance (people who have very young looking photos in their favorites, or people who comment about "beautiful faces"), you will quickly be burned at the stake by the "normal" gays. So respectfully, I'd advise you to delete this blog. The discussion is a losing battle. Best wishes.

bigeorge

9 years ago

Hey, calm down, If you dont agree its all Ok, if you do ts ok too, but do not come with dumbass sayings about waht is the law in tn the USA being that country the biggest in child abouse and child pornography. Legal is egal and that is right, gotta go by the law, even if you do not agree. Hey, no need to call names as predators or pedophiles, why if someone thinks different you have to put a label on him/her. Do ou like to ba called faggot, sissy or other names? I dont, so I do not put names in others.
This is a place to have fun, share and maybe have discussions but I do not think that anyone is here to fight or insult, if I have offended anyone with my comment, I wont ask you to forgive me, its your problem not mine, no intentions.
Keep this safe

9 years ago

only a person with a sick mind or a deviant would want them to be younger than what they really are

80duck

9 years ago

Simply No!

sooboy

9 years ago

I discovered the "flag" option a while ago and have used it two or three times to let whoever looks at those about pics I came across. I was thinking the same thing someone else mentioned, would hate to see this site go away because someone posted some obviously underage stuff. We don't need to be thought police but should clean up our own back yard when needed. Just my two cents on the subject.

darkknightreturns

9 years ago

Youger's comment suggests "all pretty boys" THE LEGAL AGE FOR PICS OF A SEXUAL OR NUDITY NATURE IN CANADA AND MOST STATES IN THE USA IS 18. To post transfer, send or receive pictures under age 18 constitutes "possession of child pornography".

One of the reasons I'm so surprised Nick has not posted rules/ guidelines when new members sign in with a new account. For his and the sites legal and liability there should be rules for pics, videos, and blogs about nudes under 18. It has been suggested to initiate "monitors" without success, to take the monitoring/censorship workload off Nick. Sooner or later something will pop up on this site and Nick may see it shut down
He has provided a fantastic site here free, for which we are all grateful, where older can help and advise younger, and younger feel comfortable they are not "meat" being hunted. It's like anal sex....use protection! lmao!

9 years ago

And I've seen too many on this site trying to justify it. There is no justification for it.

9 years ago

When it comes to sexual predators trying to be clever, either trying to meet other sexual predators or trying to find underage boys to take advantage of, I will not shut the fuck up either.

9 years ago

I wont calm the fuck down or shut up.... sum have tried and failed lol

bigeorge's Blogs

Send Message to bigeorge

Youger

Comments